Summary
stating similarly that "the new statute [must be] intended simply to explain and to clarify the existing law rather than to change the meaning of the original law"
Summary of this case from Magee v. Francesca's Holding Corp.Opinion
Argued February 17, 1993 —
Decided March 25, 1993.
Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.
Janice L. Richter argued the cause for appellants ( Richter Scaramella, attorneys).
Stacy L. Moore, Jr., argued the cause for respondent ( Parker, McCay Criscuolo, attorneys).
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 258 N.J. Super. 380, 609 A.2d 781 (1992).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, HANDLER, POLLOCK, O'HERN, GARIBALDI and STEIN — 7.
Opposed — None.