From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scherffius v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P

09-01-2021

MICHAEL E. SCHERFFIUS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 9, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. (ECF No. 96.) Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 9, 2021 (ECF No. 96), are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 92) is denied.


Summaries of

Scherffius v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2021
2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Scherffius v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL E. SCHERFFIUS, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTOPHER SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

2:13-cv-1277 JAM DB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2021)