From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schepp v. School Bd. of Broward Cty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1987
506 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 4-86-0359.

May 6, 1987. Clarification Denied June 2, 1987.

Appeal from the Department of Administration, Division of Administrative Hearings.

Robert F. McKee of Kelly McKee, P.A., Tampa, for appellant.

Edward J. Marko and Robert Paul Vignola of Marko Stephany, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


We agree with appellant that the school board should not have considered any findings of misconduct associated with Counts I and III of the administrative charges brought against him because he was found to be innocent of the charges set out in those counts and he was never given proper notice of the alleged lesser misconduct found by the hearing officer. We find, however, substantial competent evidence and no procedural irregularity with reference to the remaining charges and findings of the hearing officer or the board's approval thereof.

Accordingly, we remand this cause to the school board with directions that disciplinary action against the appellant be reconsidered without reference to the alleged misconduct associated with Counts I and III.

ANSTEAD, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schepp v. School Bd. of Broward Cty

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jun 2, 1987
506 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Schepp v. School Bd. of Broward Cty

Case Details

Full title:ERNEST SCHEPP, APPELLANT, v. THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jun 2, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Werner v. State

Munch v. Department of Professional Regulation, 592 So.2d 1136, 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)("Because we reverse…

Cottrill v. Department of Insurance

Munch v. Department of Professional Regulation, 592 So.2d 1136, 1144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)("Because we reverse…