From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schenck v. Latuska

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 14, 2013
No. 11 WM 2013 (Pa. Mar. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11 WM 2013

03-14-2013

BEVERLY J. SCHENCK, Petitioner v. EDWARD G. LATUSKA, RONALD E. FLATT, KENNETH J. FRENCHAK, JR., SUPERVISORS OF CENTER TWP AND RESIDENTS AND TAXPAYERS OF CENTER TWP, BUTLER COUNTY, PA, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of March, 2013, the "Application for Exercise of King[']s Bench Power" is DENIED.


Summaries of

Schenck v. Latuska

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
Mar 14, 2013
No. 11 WM 2013 (Pa. Mar. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Schenck v. Latuska

Case Details

Full title:BEVERLY J. SCHENCK, Petitioner v. EDWARD G. LATUSKA, RONALD E. FLATT…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 14, 2013

Citations

No. 11 WM 2013 (Pa. Mar. 14, 2013)