From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scheidler v. Delaware Women's Health Organization

U.S.
Dec 12, 1994
513 U.S. 1058 (1994)

Summary

holding that "employers who knowingly hire workers within a protected group seldom will be credible targets for charges of a pretextual firing."

Summary of this case from King v. Georgetown University Hosp.

Opinion

Nos. 94-716, 94-718.

December 12, 1994.


C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 25 F.3d 1053.


Summaries of

Scheidler v. Delaware Women's Health Organization

U.S.
Dec 12, 1994
513 U.S. 1058 (1994)

holding that "employers who knowingly hire workers within a protected group seldom will be credible targets for charges of a pretextual firing."

Summary of this case from King v. Georgetown University Hosp.

holding that similar definition of employer in Age Discrimination in Employment Act; 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; does not provide for individual liability

Summary of this case from Perodeau v. Hartford

finding that an alleged discriminatory statement was too remote to serve as evidence of age discrimination

Summary of this case from Alderman v. Inmar Enterprises, Inc.

finding in case where state law fraud claims were asserted in conjunction with federal securities claims that plaintiff's common law claims are not per se preempted but concluding after performing preemption analysis that the state claims are preempted to the extent they conflict with the federal regulatory scheme

Summary of this case from Green v. Fund Asset Management, L.P.

Imposing "personal liability would place a heavy burden on those who routinely make personnel decisions for enterprises employing twenty or more persons, and we do not read the statute as imposing it. Instead, we read § 630(b) as an unremarkable expression of respondeat superior — that discriminatory personnel actions taken by an employer's agent may create liability for the employer."

Summary of this case from Cummings v. Pearson Education, Inc.

noting in age discrimination case that evidence of "stray remarks" having a patina of discriminatory animus lacks probative value

Summary of this case from Fitch v. Solipsys Corp.

noting that state and federal procedural due process protections are identical

Summary of this case from Fat. Fam. v. Hon. Mulligan
Case details for

Scheidler v. Delaware Women's Health Organization

Case Details

Full title:SCHEIDLER ET AL. v. DELAWARE WOMEN'S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, INC., ET AL…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 12, 1994

Citations

513 U.S. 1058 (1994)

Citing Cases

Starr Found. v. American Intl

the ultimate drop in AIG's share price was greater than it otherwise would have been because general market…

Shelby County Health v. Southern Council

This highly deferential standard of review is appropriate only if the benefit plan contains "`a clear grant…