From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scheer v. Fish

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh
Sep 7, 2022
2:21-CV-00949-CRE (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-CV-00949-CRE

09-07-2022

JUSTIN SCHEER, Plaintiff, v. AMY FISH, RICARDO SUZINSKY, REMNANT HOUSE, DAVID SUTTON, F.A.A.C.T. INC., DAN ACKERMAN, HOMESTEAD BOROUGH, ANTHONY MAYS, JILL E. RANGOS, Defendants,


ORDER

Cynthia Reed Eddy Chief United States Magistrate Judge

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2022, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Dan Ackerman, Amy Fish, Anthony Mays, and Ricardo Suzinsky's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32) is GRANTED and all claims asserted against them are dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Scheer v. Fish

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh
Sep 7, 2022
2:21-CV-00949-CRE (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Scheer v. Fish

Case Details

Full title:JUSTIN SCHEER, Plaintiff, v. AMY FISH, RICARDO SUZINSKY, REMNANT HOUSE…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh

Date published: Sep 7, 2022

Citations

2:21-CV-00949-CRE (W.D. Pa. Sep. 7, 2022)