From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schechter v. Weiss

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 23, 1947
188 Misc. 487 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)

Opinion

January 23, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, HABER, J.

Harry Rappaport for appellant.

Samuel Brill and Harry Schechter, in person, for respondent.


There is no express covenant in the lease under which plaintiff went into possession, which requires defendant to make repairs. As a statutory tenant, plaintiff's rights and obligations are those fixed by the lease. A diminution of service might justify an application to the Office of Price Administration, for a reduction in rent but would not support an action, ex contractu, for repairs made by plaintiff.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

HAMMER, SHIENTAG and HECHT, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Schechter v. Weiss

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Jan 23, 1947
188 Misc. 487 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
Case details for

Schechter v. Weiss

Case Details

Full title:HARRY SCHECHTER, Respondent, v. MINNIE WEISS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Jan 23, 1947

Citations

188 Misc. 487 (N.Y. App. Term 1947)
68 N.Y.S.2d 507