From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schatz v. Christel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 1931
232 App. Div. 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

April 10, 1931.

Appeal from Supreme Court of Bronx County.

Henry Mayer, for the appellants.

O.H. Droege, for the respondent.

Present — FINCH, P.J., MERRELL, McAVOY, MARTIN and O'MALLEY, JJ.


The plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with their business or employees, or any person or persons, corporation or corporations doing business with the plaintiffs and from threatening, intimidating, coercing or using force upon the plaintiffs and their customers and from asserting by any written matter that the plaintiffs are conducting a non-union shop, or that there is a strike in process in plaintiffs' shop, and from in any way preventing the public or customers from doing business with the plaintiffs.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted to the extent indicated.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted to the extent indicated. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Schatz v. Christel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 10, 1931
232 App. Div. 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Schatz v. Christel

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS SCHATZ and Another, Appellants, v. CHARLES CHRISTEL, as President of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 10, 1931

Citations

232 App. Div. 160 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
249 N.Y.S. 804