From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schattner v. Heriman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

February, 1936.


In an action to recover for moneys alleged to have been loaned to defendant, judgment in favor of the plaintiff and order denying the defendant's motion for a new trial reversed on the law, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. A sealed verdict was ordered. The jury disagreed and were permitted to separate for the night. Upon reassembling the following morning, the justice further charged the jury in the absence of defendant and his counsel. The verdict thereupon rendered was irregular. Young, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schattner v. Heriman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1936
247 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Schattner v. Heriman

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS SCHATTNER, Respondent, v. FRED C. HERIMAN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1936

Citations

247 App. Div. 730 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Hand v. Hill

( Porret v. City of New York, 252 N.Y. 208.) This case is not within the rule stated in Schattner v. Heriman…