From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 9, 2022
1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG)

09-09-2022

Thomas Schansman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al., Defendants


ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:

In light of the dismissal of claims against MoneyGram at ECF No. 432 and the appearance of new counsel for the remaining defendants VTB Bank PJSC and Sberbank of Russia PJSC, the Court orders the parties to file a joint letter stating whether they wish to decide the outstanding motions at ECF Nos. 213, 217, 220, 222, and 257 as submitted.

If the parties would like the Court to decide the outstanding motions as submitted, no further action is needed.

If the parties wish to file updated versions of the motions, the Court will deny the current motions without prejudice to allow new counsel to file their own versions of the motions. If the parties choose this option, they should submit a briefing schedule.

The Parties are ordered to file a joint status report stating their positions by September 13, 2022.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 9, 2022
1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Schansman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 9, 2022

Citations

1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2022)