From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)

Opinion

1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG)

06-23-2022

Thomas Schansman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' letter motion to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Defendants The Western Union Company and Western Union Financial Services, Inc. (“Western Union”) in this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), as Plaintiffs and Western Union have agreed to a resolution of the claims as between them. Western Union consents to the proposed motion. ECF No. 334.

The Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the claims against Western Union. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 210 and 215.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 23, 2022
1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Schansman v. Sberbank of Russ. PJSC

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Schansman, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Sberbank of Russia PJSC et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2022

Citations

1:19-CV-02985 (ALC) (GWG) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2022)