From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schanck v. Gayhart

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 31, 2017
CASE NO. 1D17-2873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1D17-2873

08-31-2017

JOHN G. SCHANCK, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM M. GAYHART and DEBRA L. BUCHANAN, as co-personal representatives of The Estate Of Myong-He Gayhart Respondents.

Stephanie A. Sussman of Bledsoe, Jacobson, Schmidt, Wright & Sussman, Jacksonville, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents.


NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Second Amended Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction. Stephanie A. Sussman of Bledsoe, Jacobson, Schmidt, Wright & Sussman, Jacksonville, for Petitioner. No appearance for Respondents. PER CURIAM.

The second amended petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits. RAY, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Schanck v. Gayhart

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Aug 31, 2017
CASE NO. 1D17-2873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2017)
Case details for

Schanck v. Gayhart

Case Details

Full title:JOHN G. SCHANCK, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM M. GAYHART and DEBRA L. BUCHANAN…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Aug 31, 2017

Citations

CASE NO. 1D17-2873 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Aug. 31, 2017)