From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schak v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 17, 2024
3:24-CV-027-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:24-CV-027-KDB-DCK

01-17-2024

ROBERT SCHAK, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

David C. Keesler United States Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 37) filed by Gary W. Jackson, concerning Rebecca A. Peterson, on January 16, 2024. Rebecca A. Peterson seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 37) is GRANTED. Rebecca A. Peterson is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Schak v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 17, 2024
3:24-CV-027-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Schak v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SCHAK, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

3:24-CV-027-KDB-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)