From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schaeffer v. Roper

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 4:03-CV-60 CAS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 30, 2006)

Opinion

No. 4:03-CV-60 CAS.

March 30, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on state prisoner Joseph Schaeffer's action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton for report and recommendation on all dispositive matters and for final disposition on all non-dispositive matters, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

On March 3, 2006, Judge Blanton filed a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, which recommended that Schaeffer's petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied. Petitioner filed timely objections to the Report and Recommendation, asserting that he received ineffective assistance of counsel from trial and appellate counsel and claims eight, nine, and ten are not procedurally defaulted. Petitioner concedes that the Magistrate's findings are correct and proper regarding his first claim for relief, which asserted petitioner was denied his due process rights when the court denied his motion for judgment of acquittal at trial. Further, petitioner does not object to the Magistrate's findings on claims five and six of his habeas petition regarding the adequacy of Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15. The Court has carefully reviewed petitioner's objections and the entire record of this matter. Following de novo review, the Court concurs in the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, as contained in the well-reasoned and thorough Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's objections are overruled.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge is sustained, adopted and incorporated herein. [Doc. 16]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Schaeffer's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED. [Doc. 4]

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED, with no further action to take place herein.

An appropriate judgment will accompany this order.


Summaries of

Schaeffer v. Roper

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Mar 30, 2006
No. 4:03-CV-60 CAS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 30, 2006)
Case details for

Schaeffer v. Roper

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH SCHAEFFER, Petitioner, v. DONALD ROPER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 30, 2006

Citations

No. 4:03-CV-60 CAS (E.D. Mo. Mar. 30, 2006)

Citing Cases

Jones v. Griffith

The extent of cross-examination is a matter of trial strategy that must be left to the judgment of counsel.…

Barnett v. Roper

The Court cannot say that the state court's application of the procedural rule was "exorbitant." However,…