From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schackman v. California

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 454 (1967)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.

No. 995.

Decided June 12, 1967.

Judgments reversed.

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.


The judgments of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, are reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm the judgments of the lower court. Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.


Summaries of

Schackman v. California

U.S.
Jun 12, 1967
388 U.S. 454 (1967)
Case details for

Schackman v. California

Case Details

Full title:SCHACKMAN ET AL. v . CALIFORNIA

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 1967

Citations

388 U.S. 454 (1967)
87 S. Ct. 2107

Citing Cases

United States v. Groner

524, 90 S.Ct. 2241, 26 L.Ed.2d 782 (1970); Walker v. Ohio, 398 U.S. 434, 90 S.Ct. 1884, 26 L.Ed.2d 385…

People v. Bloss

In that case, Judge CHARLES L. LEVIN, dissenting in the Court of Appeals, wrote (pp 340, 343-344): Keney v…