From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Schack v. Wainwright

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1964
166 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1964)

Opinion

No. 33477.

June 3, 1964. Certiorari Denied October 12, 1964. See 85 S.Ct. 141.

Leon G. Schack, in Proper Person, for petitioner.

James W. Kynes, Atty. Gen., and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


We have for consideration an original petition for writ of habeas corpus. A motion by petitioner to vacate his judgment and sentence has previously been filed in the trial court, pursuant to Rule 1, Supreme Court Rules of Criminal Procedure, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, and denied by order of the court, finding that petitioner is not entitled to the relief requested.

Petitioner here recites the filing of petitions for writ of mandamus in the District Court of Appeal, Second District, but has failed to show a timely pursuit of appellate remedies under the Rule, and presents no independent ground for invoking the jurisdiction of this Court. Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A., Mitchell v. Wainwright, Fla. 1963, 155 So.2d 868; see also State ex rel. Ervin v. Smith et al., Fla. 1964, 160 So.2d 518.

The writ is accordingly denied.

DREW, C.J., and THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Schack v. Wainwright

Supreme Court of Florida
Oct 12, 1964
166 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1964)
Case details for

Schack v. Wainwright

Case Details

Full title:LEON G. SCHACK, PETITIONER, v. LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Oct 12, 1964

Citations

166 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1964)