From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scatto v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 25, 2022
No. CV-20-00526-TUC-SHR (D. Ariz. Apr. 25, 2022)

Opinion

CV-20-00526-TUC-SHR

04-25-2022

Lisa Scatto, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant.


ORDER

Honorable Scott H. Rash United States District Judge

On March 28, 2022, Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending the Court reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand this matter back to the ALJ for a new hearing and further proceedings. (Doc. 30 at 9.) The Magistrate Judge informed the parties they had fourteen days to file objections to the R&R and an additional fourteen days to respond. (Id. at 15.) No objections have been filed and neither party has requested additional time to do so.

If neither party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the District Court is not required to review the magistrate judge's decision under any specified standard of review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (district court only needs to review magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made). However, the statute for review of a magistrate judge's recommendation “does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.

In this case, the deadline for filing objections was on April 11, 2022. As noted, no objections have been filed, and neither party has requested additional time to do so. Consequently, the Court may adopt the R&R on that basis alone. See Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (district court declined to review the magistrate judge's report because no objections were filed). Nonetheless, the Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Opening Brief (Doc. 24), the Commissioner's Response Brief (Doc. 28), the Plaintiff's Reply Brief (Doc. 29), and Judge Kimmins' R&R. (Doc. 30.) The Court finds the R&R well-reasoned and agrees with Judge Kimmins' conclusions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins' Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. (Doc. 30.)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this case.


Summaries of

Scatto v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 25, 2022
No. CV-20-00526-TUC-SHR (D. Ariz. Apr. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Scatto v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:Lisa Scatto, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Apr 25, 2022

Citations

No. CV-20-00526-TUC-SHR (D. Ariz. Apr. 25, 2022)