Opinion
Civil Action 23-2051-KSM
01-11-2024
ROBERT J. SCARCELLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CARDO WINDOWS, INC., d/b/a Castle Windows, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 11th day of January, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Cardo Windows's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) and Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 8), Defendant Kinger Construction's opposition brief (Doc. No. 14), Cardo Windows's reply brief (Doc. No. 15), Kinger Construction's sur-reply brief (Doc. No. 17), and Cardo Windows's sur-sur-reply brief (Doc. No. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because the parties are to engage in private arbitration and no party has requested a stay pending that private arbitration, the Clerk of Court is directed to mark this matter CLOSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.