concluding that the trial court's reconfiguration of a suspended sentence to provide for drug treatment instead of home confinement was not tantamount to an increase in sentence and thus was not illegal
Summary of this case from Phlipot v. StateNos. 501, 2007, 532, 2007.
January 22, 2008.
Appeal from the Superior (Kent) Cr 0411008400 and 0505000145.
Decisions Without Published Opinions Affirmed.
concluding that the trial court's reconfiguration of a suspended sentence to provide for drug treatment instead of home confinement was not tantamount to an increase in sentence and thus was not illegal
Summary of this case from Phlipot v. StateFull title:Scarborough v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Jan 22, 2008
See Hassett v. State, 2011 WL 446561 (Del. Feb. 8, 2011) (holding that GPS monitoring required under 11 Del.…