We draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the State and assume the truth of the State's evidence. State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770, 445 P.3d 960 (2019), cert. denied, Scanlan v. Washington, 140 S.Ct. 834, 205 L.Ed.2d 483 (2020). We do not review credibility determinations.
We must view "'the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution'" and ask whether "'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'" State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770, 445 P.3d 960 (2019), cert. denied, Scanlan v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 834, 205 L.Ed.2d 483 (2020) (quoting State v. Green, 94 Wn.2d 216, 221, 616 P.2d 628 (1980) (plurality opinion)). "A claim of insufficiency admits the truth of the State's evidence and all inferences that reasonably can be drawn therefrom."
'"A claim of insufficiency admits the truth of the State's evidence," and all reasonable inferences arising therefrom '"must be drawn in favor of the State and interpreted most strongly against the defendant.'" State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770, 445 P.3d 960 (2019), cert, denied, Scanlan v. Washington, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 834, 205 L.Ed.2d 483 (2020) (quoting State v. Salinas, 119 Wn.2d 192, 201, 829 P.2d 1068 (1992)). RCW 9.68A.090 prohibits "communication with children for the predatory purpose of promoting their exposure to and involvement in sexual misconduct."
We draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the State and assume the truth of the State's evidence. State v. Scanlan, 193 Wn.2d 753, 770, 445 P.3d 960 (2019), cert, denied, Scanlan v. Washington, 140 S.Ct. 834, 204 L.Ed.2d 483 (2020). We cannot review the trier of fact's credibility determinations.