Opinion
2:21-cv-02189-APG-NJK
01-13-2022
SANDRA SCAMMAN Plaintiff, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10; ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive, Defendants.
CHKISTIAM M. GRIFFIN BRIAN K. HARRIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs JONATHAN W. CARLSON, FRANK A TODDRE, Attorneys for Defendant
CHKISTIAM M. GRIFFIN BRIAN K. HARRIS Attorneys for Plaintiffs
JONATHAN W. CARLSON, FRANK A TODDRE, Attorneys for Defendant
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST)
The above parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST). The parties are discussing possible alternative resolutions and would like to take time to explore further discussions before expending party and court resources.
While the parties stipulated to an earlier extension, the parties remain optimistic that a resolution will be forthcoming. As such, the parties request an additional extension of the current response deadlines as follows:
PROPOSED BRIEFING:
Plaintiff s Response: February 1, 2022
Defendant's Reply: February 8, 2022
HARRIS & HARRIS
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD WAYTE & CARRUTH, LLP
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE APPROVED
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE APPROVED
IT IS SO ORDERED.