From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scamman v. GEICO Cas. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 13, 2022
2:21-cv-02188-APU-NJR (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02188-APU-NJR

01-13-2022

SANDRA SCAMMAN Plaintiff, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10; ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive, Defendants.


STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUESTS)

The above parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (SECOND REQUEST). The parties are discussing possible alternative resolutions and would like to take time to explore further discussions before expending party and court resources.

While the parties stipulated to an earlier extension, the parties remain optimistic that a resolution will be forthcoming. As such, the parties request an additional extension of the current response deadlines as follows:

PROPOSED BRIEFING:

Plaintiff s Response

February 1, 2022

Defendant's Reply

February 8, 2022

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Scamman v. GEICO Cas. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 13, 2022
2:21-cv-02188-APU-NJR (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Scamman v. GEICO Cas. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SANDRA SCAMMAN Plaintiff, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-02188-APU-NJR (D. Nev. Jan. 13, 2022)