Opinion
2:21-cv-02189-APG-NJK
01-04-2022
SANDRA SCAMMAN, Plaintiff, v. GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10; ROE CORPORA TIO NS 11-20, inclusive, Defendants.
HARRIS & HARRIS BRIAN K. HARRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7737 CHRISTIAN N. GRIFFIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10601 Attorneys for Plaintiffs McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD WA YTE & CARRUTH, LLP JONA THAN W. CARLSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10536 FRANK A TODDRE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11474 Attorneys for Defendant
HARRIS & HARRIS BRIAN K. HARRIS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7737 CHRISTIAN N. GRIFFIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10601 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD WA YTE & CARRUTH, LLP JONA THAN W. CARLSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10536 FRANK A TODDRE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11474 Attorneys for Defendant
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
The above parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT GEICO'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT.
The parties are discussing possible alternative resolutions and would like to take time to explore further discussions before expending party and court resources.
Accordingly, the parties request a sixteen (16) day extension of the current response deadlines as follows:
PROPOSED BRIEFING:
Plaintiffs Response :January 19, 2022
Defendant's Reply :January 26, 2022
IT IS SO ORDERED.