From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scalia v. Glielmi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1994
200 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

January 18, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Orange County (Spindel, J.H.O.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

By agreement dated January 7, 1988, the defendant purchased the Little Italy Deli of Midtown, Inc., including the business assets and lease, from the plaintiffs. The purchase price included a $145,000 promissory note payable in installments of $1,400 per month for 10 years. The agreement and the promissory note were made contingent on the defendant executing, upon expiration of the existing lease on the premises, a new five-year lease at the maximum rent of $2,700 per month, with the option to renew the lease for an additional five years.

On September 8, 1988, the defendant executed a new lease for the subject premises for a one-year period, made no effort to secure a five-year lease with an option to renew, and continued making payments to the plaintiffs pursuant to the promissory note through August 1989. The defendant's last payment to the plaintiffs was made on August 7, 1989. The plaintiffs brought the instant action to recover the balance which remained unpaid on the promissory note, and, after a nonjury trial, judgment was entered in their favor. On this appeal, the defendant claims that because he did not execute a five-year lease at the maximum rent of $2,700 per month with an option to renew for five years, the condition in the agreement failed, and therefore the promissory note terminated by its own terms.

It is well settled that "the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted in an agreement may waive the condition" (Oak Bee Corp. v. Blankman Co., 154 A.D.2d 3, 7; see, Weinprop, Inc. v. Foreal Homes, 79 A.D.2d 987). We find that the buyer waived his right to rescind or terminate the agreement and the promissory note when he accepted a one-year lease, and continued to perform under the terms of the agreement through August 1989. Mangano, P.J., O'Brien, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Scalia v. Glielmi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 18, 1994
200 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Scalia v. Glielmi

Case Details

Full title:PETER SCALIA et al., Respondents, v. PAUL GLIELMI, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 18, 1994

Citations

200 A.D.2d 614 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
606 N.Y.S.2d 722

Citing Cases

Sarbro: VII v. City of Binghamton

This intent was further reflected in the 1994 Agreement where defendant reserved to itself the right to…

Hoosier Energy Ru. Elec. v. Amoco Tax Leasing

"It is well settled that `the party for whose benefit a condition is inserted in an agreement may waive the…