From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Scahall v. Unigard Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 22, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Wesley, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiff's action seeking to compel defendant, Unigard Insurance Co. (Unigard), to pay first-party (No-Fault) benefits pursuant to the policy issued to plaintiff. 11 NYCRR 65.15 (m) (2) (i) requires an insurance company to pay first-party benefits where coverage has been excluded for an applicant operating a vehicle while in an intoxicated condition "if such intoxicated * * * condition was not a contributing cause of the accident causing [his] injuries". Plaintiff submitted proof that a tractor-trailer was obstructing plaintiff's decedent's lane of travel and that the driver of the tractor-trailer was cited for failure to yield the right-of-way. Plaintiff has demonstrated by proof in admissible form that there is a triable issue of fact whether there was a causal connection between the intoxication of plaintiff's decedent and the accident (see, Cernik v Sentry Ins., 131 A.D.2d 952). The conflicting expert opinions, submitted by the parties to support their positions, should not be resolved on a motion for summary judgment (see, Luthart v Danesh [appeal No. 2], 201 A.D.2d 930). Therefore, whether intoxication was a contributing cause of the accident that would entitle Unigard to exclude coverage is a question of fact for the jury (see, Baron v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 130 A.D.2d 967).


Summaries of

Scahall v. Unigard Insurance Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 22, 1995
222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Scahall v. Unigard Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH SCAHALL, as Administratrix of the Estate of WILLIAM N. SCAHALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 22, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 1070 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 856

Citing Cases

McCarthy v. Commercial Ins. Co.

Accordingly, there is no basis in either the Insurance Law or the Superintendent's regulations to preclude…

Westchester v. Progressive

Absent a proper foundation, certified laboratory results would be insufficient to make a prima facie showing…