S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Selentia O.

Full title: South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Selentia O.…

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2013-001422 (S.C. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001422 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-054

01-31-2014

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Selentia O., Derrick L., Chad H., and Derek G., Defendants, Of whom Selentia O. is the Appellant, In the interest of minor children under the age of eighteen years.

Amanda H. Craven, of Harrison White Smith & Coggins, of Spartanburg, for Appellant. Deborah Murdock, of the Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent. Todd Thigpen, of Spartanburg, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Jerry D. Vinson, Jr., Family Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Amanda H. Craven, of Harrison White Smith & Coggins, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

Deborah Murdock, of the Murdock Law Firm, LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Todd Thigpen, of Spartanburg, for Guardian ad Litem. PER CURIAM: Selentia O. appeals from the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010 & Supp. 2013). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling. AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.