From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hogan

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 3, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001676 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 3, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-001676 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-329

09-03-2014

South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Denise Hogan, Katrina Massey, and Michael Jackson, Defendants, Of Whom Michael Jackson is the Appellant. In the interest of minor children under the age of eighteen.

Mark L. Archer, of Archer Law Office, PA, of Mount Pleasant, for Appellant. Wolfgang Louis Kelly, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of North Charleston, for Respondent. Joshua Keith Roten, of Charleston, for the Guardian ad Litem.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Charleston County
Daniel E. Martin, Jr., Family Court Judge

REVERSED AND REMANDED

Mark L. Archer, of Archer Law Office, PA, of Mount Pleasant, for Appellant.

Wolfgang Louis Kelly, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of North Charleston, for Respondent.

Joshua Keith Roten, of Charleston, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: For the reasons set forth in South Carolina Department of Social Services v. Hogan, Op. No. 5269 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Sept. 3, 2014), the permanency planning order is reversed and remanded. The family court shall hold a merits hearing on the underlying removal action within thirty-five days of the remittitur.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hogan

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Sep 3, 2014
Appellate Case No. 2013-001676 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 3, 2014)
Case details for

S.C. Dep't of Soc. Servs. v. Hogan

Case Details

Full title:South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Denise Hogan…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 3, 2014

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2013-001676 (S.C. Ct. App. Sep. 3, 2014)