From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SBD Apparel Ltd. v. Strong House Gym LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2022
2:21-cv-00421-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00421-JAD-EJY

01-25-2022

SBD APPAREL LIMITED, a United Kingdom Company, Plaintiff, v. STRONGHOUSE GYM LLC, a Nevada company, TANNER MCBRIDE, an individual, ERIC AYALA, an individual and SCOTT MILLER, an individual, Defendants. STRONGHOUSE GYM LLC, a Nevada company Counter-Plaintiff, v. SBD APPAREL LIMITED, a United Kingdom Company, Counter-Defendant.

DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC JOHN L. KRIEGER CATHERINE F. HOFFMAN Pro Hac Vice Granted Attorneys for Plaintiff SBD Apparel Limited


DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC

JOHN L. KRIEGER

CATHERINE F. HOFFMAN

Pro Hac Vice Granted

Attorneys for Plaintiff SBD Apparel Limited

STIPULATED CONSENT ORDER

ECF NO. 39

Plaintiff has brought an action against Defendants claiming design patent infringement, among other claims in the Amended Complaint. STRONGHOUSE GYM LLC has filed a Counterclaim against Plaintiff. In resolution of all claims made by the Parties, with consent from all parties, and without any admission of liability on the part of any party, the Court enters the following Order:

1. Defendants consent not to make, use, sell, offer for sale or import knee sleeves set forth below (irrespective as to color or fabric pattern) or knee sleeves substantially similar thereto:

(Image Omitted)

Referred to as the "Accused Product."

2. Defendants agree to pay Plaintiff a sum certain to settle all claims set forth in this case on or before February 1, 2022.

3. Defendants agree not to challenge the validity of U.S. Pat. No. D707, 361 or seek re-examination, inter parties review, post grant review, or any other post-grant proceeding related to U.S. Pat. No. D707, 361 that can be instituted at the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board or elsewhere, unless SBD later alleges Defendants infringe U.S. Pat. No. D707, 361 in subsequent litigation or in a subsequent cease-and-desist letter to Defendants.

4. Defendants agree to disclaim United States Patent No. D884, 909 pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 253 on or before February 4, 2022.

5. The Parties agree to dismiss their respective claims set forth in the Amended Complaint and Counterclaims, or that are related to or arise out of any facts set forth therein, with prejudice.

6. Defendants represent that their current inventory (including orders in transit) of the Accused Product is less than 200 units.

7. Defendants will surrender all remaining units of the Accused Product to Plaintiff for destruction on or before January 1, 2022. Plaintiff will bear the delivery or shipping costs to have the remaining units delivered from Defendants' location to a location of Plaintiffs choosing.

8. The terms of this Order apply to the Plaintiff, Defendants, and any related companies to these parties.

9. The Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter, including enforcement of the terms of the Parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement, this Order, and any determinations as to whether a product falls within their scope.

10. The parties must file a stipulated dismissal of all claims by February 25, 2022.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

SBD Apparel Ltd. v. Strong House Gym LLC

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 25, 2022
2:21-cv-00421-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

SBD Apparel Ltd. v. Strong House Gym LLC

Case Details

Full title:SBD APPAREL LIMITED, a United Kingdom Company, Plaintiff, v. STRONGHOUSE…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00421-JAD-EJY (D. Nev. Jan. 25, 2022)