S.B. v. C.D.

Full title: S.B., Respondent, v. C.D., Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Jul 7, 2020

603 S.W.3d 381 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

No. ED 108176

07-07-2020

S.B., Respondent, v. C.D., Appellant.

FOR APPELLANT: Steven Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Road, Saint Louis, MO 63117. FOR RESPONDENT: David Stolze, 9326 Olive Blvd., Suite 200, Saint Louis, MO 63132. CO-COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: James Leightner, Nathaniel Diekman, 230 S. Bemiston Suite 600, Clayton, MO 63105.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Steven Waterkotte, 7750 Clayton Road, Saint Louis, MO 63117.

FOR RESPONDENT: David Stolze, 9326 Olive Blvd., Suite 200, Saint Louis, MO 63132.

CO-COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT: James Leightner, Nathaniel Diekman, 230 S. Bemiston Suite 600, Clayton, MO 63105.

Before: James M. Dowd, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Robin Ransom, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

C.D. appeals the judgment of the trial court, which granted a full order of protection against C.D. in favor of S.B. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2020).