From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sayrs v. Brunner

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 11, 1939
7 A.2d 403 (N.J. 1939)

Opinion

Argued May 2, 1939 —

Decided July 11, 1939.

1. A municipality cannot by ordinance create for a fixed term and fill the position of assistant city clerk, a position clearly falling within the competitive class of the classified service.

2. Held, that the proofs indicate that prosecutor's removal from his position of deputy city clerk was in the interest of economy and so proper.

On certiorari.

Before Justices PARKER, BODINE and PERSKIE.

For the prosecutor, Carl Kisselman.

For Frederick W. von Nieda, Meyer L. Sakin.


The prosecutor, William D. Sayrs, was appointed deputy city clerk of the city of Camden and clerk of elections on September 16th, 1935, and continued to perform the duties thereof until March 9th, 1939. At the time of his original appointment Camden was under the Civil Service law and he was classified in the exempt division of the classified service. Before March 9th, 1939, the city clerk's department had been assigned to Mary Walsh Kobus, director of public safety, who continued in that capacity until that date. Then the commission by vote of three to two placed the department under the jurisdiction of Frederick von Nieda, director of public affairs. At this meeting, Mr. von Nieda introduced an ordinance abolishing the position of deputy city clerk and clerk of elections for the city of Camden. Thereafter the prosecutor was immediately notified that his services were to be terminated on March 23d 1939. On that day the ordinance was adopted on final reading, but its operation was suspended by filing with the city commissioners of a petition signed by approximately ten thousand electors of the city of Camden, more than the required number, under the provisions of R.S. 40:74-5.

Prosecutor ignored the letter of discharge and continued his work for a short time without interference. On March 28th, 1939, the city clerk by direction of Director von Nieda advised the relator that his presence in the office was no longer required, in spite of the fact that the operation of the ordinance had been suspended as indicated. The relator's attempt to enter the office and perform his duties was physically obstructed by police officers until the restraint allowed by Mr. Justice Donges at the foot of this rule.

"A municipality cannot by ordinance create for a fixed term and fill the position of assistant city clerk, a position clearly falling within the competitive class of the classified service." Davaillon v. Elizabeth, 121 N.J.L. 380 .

The proofs indicate that the removal was in the interest of economy and so proper. Durkin v. Board of Fire Commissioners, City of Newark, 89 N.J.L. 468; Reck v. Board of Commissioners of North Bergen, 110 Id. 173; May v. Board of Commissioners of Town of Nutley, 111 Id. 166; Gianettino v. Civil Service Commission et al., 120 Id. 531 .

It is, therefore, unnecessary to consider the other points urged or whether the prosecutor has sought the proper remedy.

The rule will, therefore, be discharged, with costs.


Summaries of

Sayrs v. Brunner

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 11, 1939
7 A.2d 403 (N.J. 1939)
Case details for

Sayrs v. Brunner

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM D. SAYRS, PROSECUTOR, v. GEORGE E. BRUNNER ET AL., DEFENDANTS

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 11, 1939

Citations

7 A.2d 403 (N.J. 1939)
7 A.2d 403

Citing Cases

City of St. Louis v. Smith

, 116 Mont. 584, 155 P.2d 956; Carter Carburetor Corp. v. St. Louis, 356 Mo. 646, 203 S.W.2d 438; State ex…