From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:04-0333 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:04-0333.

July 10, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and has recommended that the court grant FMRS's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket 62) and deny Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket 65). The plaintiff timely filed objections to the magistrates findings of fact and recommendations. The court has reviewed de novo those portions of the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation to which the plaintiff objects.

The plaintiff only objects to the Magistrate Judge's finding that the defendant had a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the plaintiff's termination. The plaintiff claims the reason stated for his termination is not a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason. As a result, the plaintiff claims the Magistrate Judge erred in finding that age and gender discrimination did not occur as a matter of law.

The defendant's reason for terminating the plaintiff was because the plaintiff engaged in an unauthorized conversation with a client about the legalization of marijuana on his first day at work. In this conversation, the plaintiff indicated that proponents advocating for the legalization of marijuana had some valid arguments. FMRS claims that it decided to terminate the plaintiff because the plaintiff was hired as a "Substance Abuse Therapist," and it determined his statements would hinder clients in their ability to remain substance free.

The plaintiff claims that this reason for terminating him is not "a legitimate, non-discriminatory" reason. I disagree. FMRS has an interest in ensuring that its therapists do not undermine its efforts to help substance abusers recover from their addiction. It is reasonable for FMRS to conclude that a therapist with the plaintiff's views might be detrimental to its purpose if the plaintiff continued to express his views to FMRS's clients. As a result, FMRS may choose to terminate the plaintiff, an "at will" employee, because it views his conduct as detrimental to its cause. Agreeing with the Magistrate Judge, the court FINDS FMRS's reason for terminating the plaintiff is "a legitimate, non-discriminatory" reason.

Therefore, the court accepts and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and orders judgment consistent with the findings and recommendations. The court GRANTS the defendant's motion for summary judgment, DENIES the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and DISMISSES the case from the active docket.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Jul 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:04-0333 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GARY W. SAYRE, Plaintiff, v. FMRS MENTAL HEALTH COUNCIL, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division

Date published: Jul 10, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:04-0333 (S.D.W. Va. Jul. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council, Inc.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sayre v. FMRS Mental Health Council,…