From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sayago v. Jiminez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
No. CV. 09-1295-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. CV. 09-1295-HU

11-23-2011

JOSEPH ALFREDO SAYAGO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANGEL JIMINEZ, et al., Defendants.

D. Michael Dale LAW OFFICES OF D. MICHAEL DALE Meg Heaton NORTHWEST WORKERS' JUSTICE PROJECT Attorneys for Plaintiffs


ORDER

D. Michael Dale

LAW OFFICES OF D. MICHAEL DALE

Meg Heaton

NORTHWEST WORKERS' JUSTICE PROJECT

Attorneys for Plaintiffs HERNANDEZ, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Dennis James Hubel issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. #59) on November 3, 2011, in which he recommends that I deny Plaintiffs' motion for relief from judgment (doc. #55). The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

CONCLUSION

The court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations (doc. #59). Accordingly, Plaintiffs' motion for relief from judgment (doc. #55) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Marco A. Hernandez

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sayago v. Jiminez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Nov 23, 2011
No. CV. 09-1295-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Sayago v. Jiminez

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH ALFREDO SAYAGO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. ANGEL JIMINEZ, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 23, 2011

Citations

No. CV. 09-1295-HU (D. Or. Nov. 23, 2011)

Citing Cases

McPhatter v. Ryan

That is because "[s]tatutes of limitation have as one purpose allowing a defendant relief from being forced…