From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saxton v. Yannuzzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)

Opinion

September, 1927.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Broome County.


There was sufficient competent evidence justifying the finding by the jury that the defendant Yannuzzi was the owner of the automobile causing the accident. But the alleged report of the accident, made to the sheriff by the driver of the car, was hearsay as to the said defendant and its admission in evidence was harmful error in view of the sharp dispute as to the ownership of the car. Cochrane, P.J., Van Kirk, Hinman, McCann and Davis, JJ., concur. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.


Summaries of

Saxton v. Yannuzzi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1927
221 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)
Case details for

Saxton v. Yannuzzi

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE M. SAXTON, as Administrator, etc., of EDNA D. WEAVER, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1927

Citations

221 App. Div. 817 (N.Y. App. Div. 1927)