From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saxon Steamship Company v. the Anna Sheridan

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 18, 1961
286 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1961)

Opinion

Nos. 13280-13284.

Argued December 15, 1960.

Decided January 18, 1961. Rehearing Denied February 21, 1961.

Harrison G. Kildare, Philadelphia, Pa. (Rawle Henderson, Richard W. Palmer, J. Welles Henderson, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Saxon S.S. Co., etc. and Isbrandtsen Co.

George E. Beechwood, Philadelphia, Pa. (J. Paul Erwin, Jr., Beechwood Lovitt, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Tug Anna Sheridan and Tug Anna Sheridan Corp.

James B. Doak, Philadelphia, Pa. (LaBrum Doak, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for Barge Lake Farge Corp.

Before KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.


These consolidated appeals are from decrees of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered in three admiralty actions for damages arising by reason of a collision between the steamship Saxon and the barge T.J. Sheridan while it was in tow of the tug Anna Sheridan in the Delaware River on November 9, 1954.

Appeals numbered 13280-81-82 and 84 were taken by the Saxon from decrees dismissing her libel against the tug Anna Sheridan and her cross-libel against the barge T.J. Sheridan and the tug Anna Sheridan and directing that the barge T.J. Sheridan recover damages from the Saxon.

Appeal No. 13283 was taken by the barge T.J. Sheridan from the decree dismissing her libel against the tug Anna Sheridan. This appeal was taken as a "protective measure."

The crux of the Saxon's contention with respect to her appeals is that this Court, as a matter of law, is required by the record and on the facts as found by the District Court to conclude that the tug Anna Sheridan committed statutory faults thus imposing the burden upon her, which she failed to meet, of showing that they could not have been the cause of the collision.

Upon review of the record and the exhaustive analysis made by Judge Grim in his well-considered opinion we find no error in the disposition below.

Reported at D.C.E.D.Pa. 1960, 183 F. Supp. 132.

The decrees of the District Court will be affirmed.


Summaries of

Saxon Steamship Company v. the Anna Sheridan

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Jan 18, 1961
286 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1961)
Case details for

Saxon Steamship Company v. the Anna Sheridan

Case Details

Full title:SAXON STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., owner of the Steamship Saxon, Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

Date published: Jan 18, 1961

Citations

286 F.2d 247 (3d Cir. 1961)

Citing Cases

Williamson Leasing v. Am. Commercial Lines

A channel 300-feet wide, which is the normal, warm weather width of the navigable center of the Illinois…

Tempest v. United States

However, as Judge Weinfeld said in his opinion: "The Rule is not absolute. It is not required that it be…