From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sawyer v. Potash

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2007
223 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-1429.

Submitted: March 14, 2007.

Decided: April 4, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cv-00078-H).

D'Anna Russo Sawyer, Appellant Pro Se. Samuel McKinley Gray, III, Ward Smith, P.A., New Bern, North Carolina; Jeremy R. Sayre, Ward Smith, P.A., Raleigh, North Carolina; Ann S. Estridge, Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina, Robert Boyd Jones, Jr., Cranfill, Sumner Hartzog, L.L.P., Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


D'Anna Russo Sawyer appeals the district court's order dismissing her action filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001- 1461 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sawyer's motion for stay and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sawyer v. Potash Corp., 417 F.Supp.2d 730 (E.D.N.C. 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sawyer v. Potash

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 4, 2007
223 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Sawyer v. Potash

Case Details

Full title:D'Anna Russo SAWYER, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 4, 2007

Citations

223 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Skinder v. Fed. Express Long Term Disability Plan

Hedrick v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1, No. 1:19-CV-971, 2021 WL 602632, at *8 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 16, 2021);…

Hudson v. Plumbers & Steamfitters Local No. 150 Pension Fund

As stated by the Fourth Circuit, a party with “with no control over its [the plan's] administration, is not a…