From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sawhney v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2004
13 A.D.3d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

4209

December 21, 2004.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2003, which denied the motion of defendants Bailey and Lily Transportation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.


Although it is well settled that a rear-end collision with a stopped vehicle creates a presumption that the operator of the moving vehicle was negligent ( see Agramonte v. City of New York, 288 AD2d 75), issues may arise as to whether the driver of the forward vehicle stopped or slowed suddenly ( see Martin v. Pullafico, 272 AD2d 305). Since there is conflict as to whether the driver of the truck suddenly slowed as he approached an overpass on a highway on which the truck was not permitted in the first place, the denial of summary judgment was appropriate.


Summaries of

Sawhney v. Bailey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 21, 2004
13 A.D.3d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Sawhney v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:JASMINDER SAWHNEY et al., Respondents, v. WALTER P. BAILEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 21, 2004

Citations

13 A.D.3d 203 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
786 N.Y.S.2d 490

Citing Cases

Reyna v. Al-Hassan

However, a triable issue of fact may be presented if the driver of the forward vehicle stopped or slowed…

Pan v. Haynes

Berger follows a rule implied in a handful of First Department cases over the same time period. (Cf. Somers…