From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savings Bank of Utica v. Valley Plaza Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1998
255 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

November 13, 1998

Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Ark, J. — Summary Judgment.

Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Pigott, Jr., and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We note that there is a discrepancy between Supreme Court's decision and the subsequent order. The court in its decision granted the motion of plaintiff for summary judgment against defendant Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A., as executor/trustee of the estate of Hugh J. Knapp, deceased (Chase Manhattan), and denied the cross motion of Chase Manhattan for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The order, however, does not address that motion and cross motion. To the extent that the order conflicts with the decision, the decision controls ( see, Matter of Edward V., 204 A.D.2d 1060, 1061). Thus, we modify the order accordingly.


Summaries of

Savings Bank of Utica v. Valley Plaza Assoc

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 13, 1998
255 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Savings Bank of Utica v. Valley Plaza Assoc

Case Details

Full title:SAVINGS BANK OF UTICA, Respondent, v. VALLEY PLAZA ASSOCIATES, L.P., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 13, 1998

Citations

255 A.D.2d 974 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
679 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Matter of King v. King

Where there is a conflict between a decision and order, the decision controls, and the order is modified to…