From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savannah v. Savannah

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 3, 2012
NO. 02-12-00072-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 02-12-00072-CV

05-03-2012

BOBBY SAVANNAH APPELLANT v. JEFFREY SAVANNAH APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On December 20, 2011, the trial court signed a take-nothing judgment against pro se appellant Bobby Savannah. Appellant's notice of appeal was therefore due on January 19, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, filed his notice of appeal with the county clerk on February 16, 2012. We sent a letter to appellant to express our concern that we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the notice of appeal is untimely. Appellant responded to our letter with a letter of his own, but appellant's letter does not show adequate grounds for continuing his appeal. Because our jurisdiction depends on a timely notice of appeal and because appellant's notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Howlett v. Tarrant Cnty., 301 S.W.3d 840, 843 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2009, pet. denied) (op. on reh'g) (explaining that a timely filed notice of appeal confers jurisdiction on this court, and "absent a timely filed notice of appeal, we must dismiss the appeal") (citing Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Savannah v. Savannah

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
May 3, 2012
NO. 02-12-00072-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2012)
Case details for

Savannah v. Savannah

Case Details

Full title:BOBBY SAVANNAH APPELLANT v. JEFFREY SAVANNAH APPELLEE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: May 3, 2012

Citations

NO. 02-12-00072-CV (Tex. App. May. 3, 2012)