Opinion
Civil Action 2:19-cv-6026-KSM
03-29-2022
RICKY SAVAGE, Plaintiff, v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY-OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
KAREN SPENCER MARSTON, J.
AND NOW, this 29th day of March, 2022, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 50), Plaintiff's opposition brief (Doc. No. 54), and Defendants' reply brief (Doc. No. 55), and for the reasons discussed in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED and judgment entered in favor of Defendants as to:
• Counts II, IV, V, VI, XIII, and XIV in their entirety.
• Counts I, III, and VII-XII to the extent they assert claims for intersectional discrimination.
• Counts VII and X as against individual Defendants Monahan, Brown, Casey, and Muller.
• Counts VIII, IX, XI, and XII as against individual Defendants Casey and Muller.
2. Plaintiff may not recover losses related to Temple's tuition remission policy.
3. Otherwise, the motion is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.