From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savage v. Sutter Gould Medical Group

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 7, 2015
2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)

Opinion

          DILLINGHAM & MURPHY, LLP, CARLA J. HARTLEY, COREY S. UTSUROGI, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants, THE GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, INC., LESLIE D. SACKSCHEWSKY, M.D. and, PATRICK L. SNYDER, M.D.


          ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT PATRICK L. SNYDER, M.D.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION [FRCP RULES 12(c) & 56]

          JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

         Defendant Patrick L. Snyder, M.D.'s Motion for Summary Adjudication is/was scheduled for hearing on May 6, 2015. Plaintiff Dr. George Savage filed a Response on April 22, 2015 stating that he did not oppose the motion. The Court, having read and considered the matters submitted in support of the motion, and in the absence of opposition and good cause appearing, hereby grants the motion on grounds that there are no triable issues of material fact and Defendant Patrick L. Snyder, M.D. (Dr. Snyder) is entitled to summary adjudication as to the following causes of action:

1. Plaintiff's First Cause of Action, for disparate treatment based on race in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is granted on grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to Dr. Snyder and Dr. Snyder was not an employer within the meaning of Title VII;

2. Plaintiff's Third Cause of Action, for racial discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) on grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to Dr. Snyder and Dr. Snyder was not an employer within the meaning of the FEHA;

3. Plaintiff's Fourth Cause of Action, for harassment and hostile work environment on grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to Dr. Snyder;

4. Plaintiff's Fifth Cause of Action for breach of contract on the basis that Dr. Snyder was not a party to the alleged contract(s);

5. Plaintiff's Sixth Cause of Action for constructive termination on grounds that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to Dr. Snyder and that Dr. Snyder was not an employer for purposes of a constructive discharge claim;

6. Plaintiff's Seventh Cause of Action for retaliation on the ground that Plaintiff failed to exhaust administrative remedies as to Dr. Snyder and that Dr. Snyder was not an employer and therefore may not be held liable for retaliation; and

7. Plaintiff's Eighth Cause of Action as to plaintiff's claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress only on grounds that Plaintiff's claim is barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the California Workers' Compensation Act.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that summary adjudication is GRANTED in favor of Defendant Patrick L. Snyder, M.D. and against Plaintiff George Savage as to causes of action 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 as to Plaintiff's negligent infliction of emotional distress claim, only, on the grounds stated above.


Summaries of

Savage v. Sutter Gould Medical Group

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
May 7, 2015
2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Savage v. Sutter Gould Medical Group

Case Details

Full title:DR. GEORGE SAVAGE, Plaintiff, v. SUTTER GOULD MEDICAL GROUP, SUTTER GOULD…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: May 7, 2015

Citations

2:13-cv-02650-JAM-DAD (E.D. Cal. May. 7, 2015)