From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savage v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 5, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-1346 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:08-cv-1346 LKK JFM (PC).

April 5, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 17, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for a court order requiring defendants to permit him to review his deposition transcript. By order filed March 21, 2011, defendants were directed to respond to that motion within ten days. On March 29, 2011, defendants filed a response. With their response, defendants have presented evidence that between November 3, 2010 and February 8, 2011, plaintiff has reviewed his deposition transcript for periods totaling more than four hours. See Declaration of K. Allen in Support of Response to Court Order, filed March 29, 2011, at ¶ 3. Plaintiff's motion is moot and will therefore be denied.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 17, 2010 motion for an order to review his deposition transcript is denied.

DATED: April 4, 2011.


Summaries of

Savage v. Hubbard

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 5, 2011
No. 2:08-cv-1346 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2011)
Case details for

Savage v. Hubbard

Case Details

Full title:BOB SAVAGE, Plaintiff, v. SUZAN HUBBARD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 5, 2011

Citations

No. 2:08-cv-1346 LKK JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2011)