From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Savad v. Arluck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

November, 1929.


Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, the order to provide that appellant have leave to intervene in this action. Although the order to show cause obtained by appellant did not in terms ask leave to intervene, such leave was asked for in her affidavit and the order to show cause contained a prayer for general relief. We think, therefore, that this court may cure the irregularity in question and permit appellant to intervene. In our opinion, the direction to pay taxes, water rates, etc., contained in the order appointing respondent receiver, is mandatory. ( Frankenstein v. Hamburger, 73 App. Div. 352.) Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Young, Seeger and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Savad v. Arluck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1929
227 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Savad v. Arluck

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL SAVAD and ABE SAVAD, Plaintiffs, v. TESSIE ARLUCK and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1929

Citations

227 App. Div. 795 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)