From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sautter v. Horseshoe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D
Jul 20, 2010
No. 07-10-00106-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2010)

Opinion

No. 07-10-00106-CV

July 20, 2010.

Appealed from the 424th District Court of Llano County, No. 16,119; Honorable Daniel H. Mills, Judge.

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


The parties to this appeal have filed a joint motion requesting dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). According to the motion, the parties "have settled all matters in controversy and made the basis of this cause of action." The parties have also agreed that costs shall be borne by the party incurring them. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

No decision of this court having been delivered to date, we grant the motion. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our mandate will issue forthwith. All costs incurred are taxed against the party incurring them.


Summaries of

Sautter v. Horseshoe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D
Jul 20, 2010
No. 07-10-00106-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2010)
Case details for

Sautter v. Horseshoe

Case Details

Full title:JOHN T. SAUTTER, MARYAH M. SAUTTER, DONALD R. CRUVER AND ANITA E. CRUVER…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel D

Date published: Jul 20, 2010

Citations

No. 07-10-00106-CV (Tex. App. Jul. 20, 2010)