From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
381 S.W.3d 376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96474.

2012-10-2

Jewell SAUNDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0922–CC09905, Lisa S. Van Amburg, Judge. Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.


Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0922–CC09905, Lisa S. Van Amburg, Judge.
Ruth B. Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before: GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER


PER CURIAM.

Movant, Jewell Saunders, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Saunders v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.
Oct 2, 2012
381 S.W.3d 376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Saunders v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jewell SAUNDERS, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Oct 2, 2012

Citations

381 S.W.3d 376 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)