From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Phelps

Supreme Court of Delaware
May 20, 2009
3 A.3d 1098 (Del. 2009)

Opinion

No. 233, 2009.

Submitted: May 12, 2009.

Decided: May 20, 2009.

Court Below — Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County, C. A. No. 09C-02-224.


ORDER


This 20th day of May 2009, the Court has considered the Clerk's notice directing the appellant to show cause pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29(b) why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with Supreme Court Rule 42 when taking an appeal from an apparent interlocutory order. The appellant has not responded to the notice to show cause. The appellant's failure to respond to the notice to show cause is deemed to be his consent to the dismissal of this appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2), 29(b) and 42, that the appeal is DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Saunders v. Phelps

Supreme Court of Delaware
May 20, 2009
3 A.3d 1098 (Del. 2009)
Case details for

Saunders v. Phelps

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT SAUNDERS, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. WARDEN PERRY PHELPS…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: May 20, 2009

Citations

3 A.3d 1098 (Del. 2009)

Citing Cases

Southern Ry. Co. v. Swift Co.

If two causes of action were set forth in the complaint without being separately stated, the defendant, it is…