From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saunders v. Kline

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1981)

Opinion

Argued February 16, 1981

Decided March 26, 1981

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, MARTIN EVANS, J.

Stephen A. Weinstein for respondent-appellant.

Sidney Dickstein, Charles W. Saber and Richard P. Perrin for appellant-respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified to strike that portion of the order which awarded costs to the plaintiff in the trial court, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff on this appeal.

We agree with the Appellate Division, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court that the trial court erred in setting aside the jury verdict. We note, however, that the Appellate Division improperly awarded costs in all courts in contravention of CPLR 8102 (subd 1). That statute provides that in an action brought in Supreme Court, New York County, there may be no award of costs to a plaintiff who recovers less than $6,000. Therefore, although the Appellate Division had authority to assess costs against defendant on the appeal (CPLR 8107), the order of that court must be modified. This, of course, is not to say that despite this limited denial of costs the plaintiff may not recover his necessary disbursements in all courts (CPLR 8301, subd [c]).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.


Summaries of

Saunders v. Kline

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 26, 1981
53 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1981)
Case details for

Saunders v. Kline

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. SAUNDERS, Respondent-Appellant, v. NATHAN S. KLINE…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 26, 1981

Citations

53 N.Y.2d 658 (N.Y. 1981)
438 N.Y.S.2d 993
421 N.E.2d 113

Citing Cases

State v. McLeod

It is fictitiously deemed contractual, in order to fit the cause of action to the contractual remedy…

Spallina v. Giannoccaro

It is an obligation which the law creates, in the absence of any agreement, when and because the acts of the…