From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saul v. Barse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1916
113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Submitted June 5, 1916

Decided June 13, 1916


Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. Motion to amend remittitur granted and remittitur amended by adding thereto: "The appellant argued in this court that the action should have been dismissed for want of jurisdiction as brought in derogation of the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal court in the receivership action of Morehead v. Strycker to liquidate the syndicate affairs." (See 218 N.Y. 634.)


Summaries of

Saul v. Barse

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 13, 1916
113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Saul v. Barse

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE W. SAUL, Respondent, v . MILLS W. BARSE, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 13, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1063 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1063