From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sauerbrunn v. the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1913
101 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1913)

Opinion

Argued March 20, 1913

Decided April 4, 1913

John E. O'Brien and Richard J. Doyle for appellant.

Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel ( Terence Farley and Charles McIntyre of counsel), for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of McLAUGHLIN, J., below.

Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, WERNER, HISCOCK, COLLIN and CUDDEBACK, JJ. Not sitting: MILLER, J.


Summaries of

Sauerbrunn v. the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 4, 1913
101 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1913)
Case details for

Sauerbrunn v. the Bd. of Educ. of the City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ARTHUR B.J. SAUERBRUNN, Appellant, v . THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 4, 1913

Citations

101 N.E. 1120 (N.Y. 1913)
101 N.E. 1120

Citing Cases

O'Malley v. Board of Education

This means that, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, the classification in force in 1900 is still…

Matter of Rudd v. Cropsey

So there is no positive law against reduction. In such case power to fix a salary carries power to reduce it.…