From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saucedo v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2017
Case No. ED CV 16-01873 DSF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. ED CV 16-01873 DSF (AFM)

09-08-2017

MARCO ANTONIO SAUCEDO, Petitioner, v. SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report have been filed herein. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is accepted and adopted; (2) petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied; and (3) Judgment shall be entered denying the Petition and dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: 9/8/17

/s/_________

DALE S. FISCHER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Saucedo v. Hatton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 8, 2017
Case No. ED CV 16-01873 DSF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Saucedo v. Hatton

Case Details

Full title:MARCO ANTONIO SAUCEDO, Petitioner, v. SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 8, 2017

Citations

Case No. ED CV 16-01873 DSF (AFM) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 8, 2017)