From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sattizahn v. Washington Mut BK

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 15, 2006
No. 05-06-00196-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2006)

Opinion

No. 05-06-00196-CV

Opinion Filed August 15, 2006.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. CC-06-1170-B.

Dismiss.

Before Justices FITZGERALD, FRANCIS, and LANG-MIERS.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


This appeal has been pending since February 14, 2006. Neither the clerk's nor the reporter's records have been filed. On May 2, 2006, we directed appellants to provide this Court, within ten days, written verification that they had paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk's record or written documentation that they are entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We warned appellants that failure to comply could result in dismissal of the appeal. Nevertheless, to date, appellants have not filed the requested documentation regarding the clerk's record. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a), (c).


Summaries of

Sattizahn v. Washington Mut BK

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas
Aug 15, 2006
No. 05-06-00196-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2006)
Case details for

Sattizahn v. Washington Mut BK

Case Details

Full title:SARAH SATTIZAHN AND GAYLE GIWA, Appellants, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas

Date published: Aug 15, 2006

Citations

No. 05-06-00196-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 15, 2006)